【美國真相】外國專家：tik tok的用户數據沒有安全問題！_風聞

以下是來自《商業內幕》Business Insider的報道：

但是，TikTok監聽您的個人數據是否真的比Facebook和Google等社交媒體平台更糟糕？

根據專家的説法，證據表明答案是否定的。

就TikTok所説的數據而言，它看起來並不比Facebook糟。

隱私應用Jumbo的首席隱私和策略官ZoéVilain告訴《商業內幕》，TikTok的隱私政策並不比Facebook更具侵擾性。

“從我的隱私權政策來看，與Facebook和Instagram的隱私權政策相比，我看不出太大的區別。

“基本上，他們説他們是在使用您的使用情況數據，行為數據，首選項，朋友，聯繫人，為您提供服務，自定義服務，當然還有針對性的廣告，這正是… Facebook在做，Instagram也在做。” Vilain説。

But is TikTok actually any worse for snooping in your personal data than social media platforms like Facebook and Google?

 According to the experts, evidence suggests the answer is no.

In terms of the data TikTok says it sucks up, it doesn’t appear to be any worse than Facebook

Zoé Vilain, chief privacy and strategy officer at privacy app Jumbo told Business Insider that looking at TikTok’s privacy policy, it was no more intrusive than Facebook’s.

 “From what I see from the privacy policy, and in comparison with the privacy policies of Facebook and Instagram, I don’t really see much difference.”

“Basically they are saying that they are using your usage data, behavior data, preferences, friends, contacts, to provide you with their service, to customize the service, and of course to do targeted advertising […] this is exactly what Facebook is doing and Instagram is doing too,” said Vilain.

關於TikTok處理您的數據的方式，它看起來並不比其他社交媒體更可疑

隨着有關美國迫使TikTok剝離其美國業務的報道在8月初開始激增，安全研究員Baptiste Robert決定深入研究TikTok發送回其服務器的數據，以試圖消除地緣政治言論。 。

對像TikTok的應用程序進行逆向工程並不是一件容易的事，羅伯特（Robert）發表了一系列有關他的發現的文章。

羅伯特（Robert）在其第一篇文章中指出，如果使用TikTok使用數百萬行代碼，就不能指望一份報告能最終證明TikTok是否構成了國家安全威脅。

但是他也沒有發現任何可疑的東西。

“據我們所知，TikTok在目前狀態下沒有可疑行為，也沒有泄露異常數據。在移動世界中，獲取有關用户設備的數據非常普遍，對Facebook， Snapchat，Instagram等，我們也會得到類似的答案。”羅伯特的報告總結道。

In terms of how TikTok handles your data, it doesn’t look any more suspicious than other social media

As the reports about the US forcing TikTok to hive off its American business began to swirl in early August, security researcher Baptiste Robert decided to do a deep-dive into what data TikTok sends back to its servers in an attempt to cut through the geopolitical rhetoric.

Reverse-engineering an app like TikTok’s is not an easy task, and Robert is publishing a series of posts about his findings.

In his first post, Robert noted that a single report can’t be expected to definitively prove whether or not TikTok poses a national security threat given it uses millions of lines of code.

But he also didn’t find anything suspicious.

“As far as we can see, in its current state, TikTok doesn’t have a suspicious behavior and is not exfiltrating unusual data. Getting data about the user device is quite common in the mobile world and we would obtain similar results with Facebook, Snapchat, Instagram and others,” Robert’s report concluded.

關於TikTok缺乏安全性，仍然存在“合法擔憂”-但它們並非唯一

Business Insider與iOS開發人員Talal Haj Bakry進行了交談，他在3月與開發人員Tommy Mysk一起在TikTok中發現了一個安全漏洞，這意味着它可以未經他們的許可訪問iPhone用户的剪貼板，這實際上意味着TikTok可以讀取用户複製的任何文本。

研究人員指出，這可能像購物清單一樣平凡，也可能像密碼或財務信息這樣更嚴重的數據。

隨後，LinkedIn和Reddit的應用程序也被發現正在讀取iOS用户的剪貼板，而在蘋果公司開始通過iOS 14更新打擊這種做法之後，這三家公司現在都更改了其代碼。

There are still ’legitimate concerns’ around TikTok’s lackluster security — but they’re not unique

Business Insider spoke to iOS developer Talal Haj Bakry, who in March along with developer Tommy Mysk discovered a security flaw in TikTok which meant it was able to access iPhone users’ clipboards without their permission, essentially meaning TikTok could read any text the user has copied.

The researchers noted that this could be as mundane as a shopping list or more serious data like passwords or financial information.

Subsequently, LinkedIn and Reddit’s apps were also discovered to be reading iOS users’ clipboards, and all three companies have now altered their code after Apple started cracking down on the practice with its iOS 14 update.

“真探”評論：Tik Tok無罪，可是欲加之罪何患無辭。更何況，明明是“只有民豬”的美國把自己“美顏”成“自由民主”，不要臉的書把自己“美顏”成“臉書”。