美國律師：資本家的權力比美國政府還大！_風聞

​“美分”（吃狗屎的蒼蠅）最喜歡標榜美國的“言論自由”和“自由民主”，美媒AP的這篇報道超超級打臉!

上至CEO，下至普通員工，從私企到消防局，大量川粉被網絡肉搜起底，不但被解僱，甚至受到死亡威脅！

印第安納波利斯市律師事務所Faegre Drinker的勞工和就業律師蘇珊·克萊恩（Susan Kline）説，由於第一修正案的權利僅禁止人們因言論而受到政府的懲罰，因此大多數私人僱主可以解僱參加抗議活動的工人。 

有一些例外：為政府工作的人可能會受到更多的法律保護，許多工會工人也是如此，他們通常都有一份合同，列出可能被解僱的原因。一些州可能制定了保護工人言論自由的法律。

但是“週三在國會大廈上人們的行為只是在騷動，而不是抗議。”律師事務所Cozen O’Connor的勞工和就業律師亞倫·霍爾特（Aaron Holt）説。 “當某人違反法律時，幾乎永遠都不會受到保護，而且私人僱主將有紀律處分或採取某種行動以應對可能違背其基本核心價值觀的行為。”

Most private employers can fire workers for attending protests, since First Amendment rights only prohibit people from being punished by the government for their speech, not by a private employer, said Susan Kline, an Indianapolis-based labor and employment attorney at law firm Faegre Drinker.

There are some exceptions: Those who work for the government may be more legally protected, and so too are many unionized workers, who typically have a contract listing the reasons for which they could be fired. And some states may have laws that protect workers’ free speech.

But “what people did at the Capitol Wednesday was rioting, not protesting,” said Aaron Holt, a labor and employment attorney with law firm Cozen O’Connor. “When someone violates the law, that’s almost never going to be protected, and a private employer is going to be within their rights to discipline or take some kind of action in response to that that might go against their fundamental core values.”

如果加上懂王的社交賬號被封，就更加凸顯美國的“虛假”！