來自瑞典的電動飛行器公司想讓“每個人都成為飛行員”_風聞

正文翻譯

Meet the Jetson ONE. Swedish company Jetson unveiled its first personal aerial vehicle. The electric flying craft, resembling a Speeder Bike out of Star Wars, can reach 102km/h (63mph) and costs US$92,000.

讓我們認識一下Jetson 1號吧，瑞典Jetson公司推出的首款私人飛行器。這款電動飛行器和《星球大戰》裏出現的飛車很像，它的最高時速可達102公里/小時，售價為9.2萬美元。

評論翻譯

Pheebe Dee

It looks like a large drone. This is a step towards modern transportation but unfortunately this type of technology isn’t suitable for metropolitan cities, maybe rural towns. Imagine trying to fly this thing around rush hour traffic, near a condos/apartments buildings, restaurants, malls.

它看起來就像是一台大型的無人機。這是我們向現代化交通出行邁出的一步，但遺憾的是，這種技術並不適合大城市，或許會適合那些鄉村小鎮吧。想象一下吧，試着在高峯時間駕駛這玩意兒穿過公寓樓，餐館和商場會是怎樣一副光景。

Leon Campa

Very cool, but likely to be illegal to fly and operate in most 1st world countries, especially in high density areas, without a pilots’ license.The aircraft would likely need to be stored in expensive hangars too, as taking off from any residential place would be a big no no.

這玩意兒很酷，但是在大多數第一世界國家，特別是在人口密度高的地區，沒有飛行員執照就擅自執行飛行任務的話是違反法律的。而且就算買了這架飛機可能也需要將其停靠在昂貴的機庫當中，因為在任何住宅區起飛這玩意兒都是絕對禁止的。

economic mercenary

im sure that was said about cars too

我敢肯定，當初人們也是這麼形容汽車的。

Alexander-Maurice Mill (Amlaeuxrai)

I believe the launch from residential areas depends on how loud it is, for which we don’t have a reference point from this video. Besides, I believe laws in most 1st world countries would classify it as a small heli- or gyrocopter, which don’t usually need hangars anyway.

我認為這種飛行器能否在居民區起降取決於它會發出多大的聲音，不過我們在這個視頻中沒能發現可以參考的相關內容。此外我相信大多數第一世界國家的法律都會將其歸類為小型直升機或者旋翼機，它們通常都不需要機庫。

Trevor Doge

I wonder if you could get away with it in a third world country . . . Perhaps your private island

我懷疑第三世界國家也不會允許你在他們國家駕駛這玩意兒，也許只能在你的私人島嶼上面開。

原創翻譯：龍騰網 http://www.ltaaa.cn 轉載請註明出處

Vic Lorenzo

1980: “I bet there will be flying cars in the future”

2021: “Finally, some progress”

1980：我敢打賭，未來肯定會有能飛的汽車。

2021：總算取得了一些進展。

Jupiter Vortex

wdym some progress, flying cars exist for a long time already, the only problem is the safety reasons

你説的一些進展是啥意思？飛行汽車已經問世很長一段時間了，唯一的問題就是安全方面的顧慮。

Bucket Head

It’s a freaking drone. It’s not a car.

這他媽就是無人機，不是一輛汽車

RespectOthers

I’ve watched a few videos about what this futuristic-looking craft can do but have yet to hear the actual noise it makes when flying. I have a feeling it’s not that quiet.

我看過好幾個介紹這種未來風的飛行器能做些啥的視頻，但我還是沒有聽到它在飛行時究竟會發生怎樣的噪音。我有一種預感，這玩意兒不會太安靜。

HunterBidensCrackPipe

And not to mention the head chopping off propellers.

更別提那些能把你腦袋砍掉的螺旋槳了。

原創翻譯：龍騰網 http://www.ltaaa.cn 轉載請註明出處

‎‎ً v

Make sense. Heck, even tank were silence than the jetson one.

合情合理。見鬼，就連坦克也要比這個Jetson飛行器更加安靜。

leper

That looks awesome, but if there are 30,000 of them flying around you in a city, that sounds crazy. Of course in the future, maybe 6G or 7G or whatever communication will control the flight to

make it orderly.

它看起來很棒，但是如果你所在的城市有3萬架這樣的飛機在天空中飛來飛去的話，那場面絕對會很瘋狂。當然，也許未來的6G、7G或者其他什麼通信技術能夠控制這些飛行器，讓它們井然有序地飛行。