Tiktok首席執行官周受資出席美國聽證會，美國或封禁Tiktok引發網友熱議_風聞

樱落网-海外看世界翻译网站03-24 23:38

2023-03-24

Tiktok首席執行官周受資出席美國眾議院委員會聽證會**，**美國或封禁Tiktok引發網友熱議

本文譯自Youtube，原標題：TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testifies before House committee as lawmakers push to ban app | full video

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew is testifying before the House Energy and Commerce Committee as efforts to ban the Chinese-owned social media app gain momentum in Washington. The hearing is focused on TikTok’s consumer privacy and data security practices as well as its relationship with the Chinese Community Party.

TikTok首席執行官周受資（Shou Zi Chew）在眾議院能源和商業委員會（House Energy and Commerce Committee）作證，與此同時，禁止中國擁有的社交媒體應用的努力在華盛頓愈演愈烈。聽證會的重點是TikTok的消費者隱私和數據安全做法以及它與中國的關係。

AWaffle

i wish congress would actually represent Americans and work to make our lives better instead of this BS

我希望國會能真正代表美國人並努力讓我們的生活變得更好而不是像這樣胡説八道。

Jameson Henigan

Why must our congress make us look absolutely incompetent and useless??? None of these folks know what they’re talking about apparently and over half look like they have one foot in the grave… We need to vote these people out.

為什麼我們的國會一定要讓我們看起來完全無能和無用？？？顯然，這些人都不知道自己在説什麼，超過一半的人看起來好像一隻腳已經踏進了墳墓……我們需要投票淘汰這些人。

Nicolae Girnet

This is like explaining rocket science to children.

這就像給孩子們解釋火箭科學（譯註：意即比較高深難懂的事情）。

Crispy

This is why we desperately need younger people in our governments. It’s abundantly clear that these people have no clue what they are talking about regarding the internet.

這就是為什麼我們的政府中迫切需要年輕人的原因。很明顯，這些人對他們正在談論的互聯網上的內容毫無概念。

Emma Vincent

Notice how everyone is literally reading from a script but this man is speaking straight forward. And then the Congress men and women have the audacity to be arrogant towards him like he has to follow their script. Like how is this real? For this to be the GOVERNMENT and have this level of unprofessionalism and ignorance is so embarrassing

請注意，每個人都在讀劇本，只有這個人（即Tiktok的CEO）在直白地説話。然後，國會里的男男女女都厚顏無恥地傲慢地對待他，好像他必須按照他們的劇本行事一樣。對於政府來説，存在這種程度的不專業和無知是如此的令人尷尬。

Loc Nguyen

This committee is a disgrace to its citizens. I can understand the CEO arguments better than the members of the committee that won’t even let him answer theirs questions. They are undermining the CEO’s intellect.

這個委員會是公民的恥辱，我比那些甚至不讓Tiktok的首席執行官回答他們問題的委員會成員更能理解首席執行官的論點。他們正在侮辱Tiktok的首席執行官的智商。

Kiya Pryor

I am absolutely flabbergasted!!!! This whole speech at the beginning…..??? I’ve been using TikTok for for years and I’ve actually learned more about my mental health and tips that I can use and it has helped so much. I’ve learned about things happening around the world that I don’t hear on the news. This whole thing is just an embarrassment.

這着實讓我目瞪口呆！！！！開頭的整個演講…？？？多年來，我一直在使用TikTok，實際上我已經瞭解了更多關於我的心理健康和我可以使用的技巧，TikTok幫了我很多忙。我瞭解了世界各地正在發生的但沒有在新聞上聽到的事情。這整件事都讓人感覺尷尬。

IAmFromMars

The congressman asked why Ticktok cannot has drug related content not 100% cleaned but Douyin(a chinese version of tiktok only available in China) can do it. He basically asked why US law is more tolerent to drug issues than China. Anyone who releases drug related content on China media platforms will be in jail. US should challenge its law system instead of challenge tiktok.

有位國會議員問為什麼Tiktok無法100%清除與毒品有關的內容，但抖音（一種僅在中國提供的中文版Tiktok）卻可以做到，他基本上是在問為什麼美國的法律對毒品問題比中國更寬容，因為任何在中國媒體平台上發佈與毒品相關內容的人都將被關進監獄。美國應該質疑其法律體系而不是質疑Tiktok。

I thought a hearing was to let the person actually respond to their questions, not interrupt him incessantly.

我認為聽證會是為了讓當事人真正回答他們的問題而不是不斷地打斷他。

Курманбек Базаров

Asking for the revenue of Tiktok is like asking for a person’s bank balance. Imagine if someone asked you the same question “What is your bank balance? Can you give a rough number?” not everyone will feel like disclosing such information publicly.

詢問抖音的收入就像詢問一個人的銀行餘額。想象一下，如果有人問你同樣的問題“你的銀行餘額是多少？你能給出一個粗略的數字嗎”會怎樣？並不是每個人都願意公開披露這些信息。

Christine Matteson

God, Congress…please. They are so embarrassing. Do some research. Must we constantly show our ignorance?! Make America Smart Again. Get dark money out of politics, and put up some younger, brighter, candidates that better represent Americans, not people who will do the bidding of the corrupt corporations and billionaires that own them.

上帝啊，國會…拜託。他們真是太尷尬了，請做一些研究，難道我們一定要不斷地表現出我們的無知嗎？！請讓美國再次變得聰明一些。把黑錢從政治中抽走，推舉一些更年輕、更聰明、更能代表美國人的候選人而不是那些會聽從腐敗的公司和擁有這些公司的億萬富翁的命令的人。

Typical_republican654

The lawmakers acted like little kids wouldn’t let the man speak half the time

議員們表現得像小孩子一樣，他們有一半的時間都不讓這個人説話。

Ragnar Lothbrok

Bans on TikTok could have a significant and harmful impact on the free expression of ideas by users of the app. A ban could also prevent Americans from accessing a popular platform that is beneficial for creative expression, economic growth, and communication. Furthermore, a ban could impede on American businesses’ ability to reach key global markets, as well as a vast user base that is estimated to be around 800 million. Additionally, it could limit the ability of social media influencers to share their content with a global audience as TikTok is a significant platform for this purpose.

針對TikTok的禁令可能會對該應用的用户自由表達想法的權利產生重大而有害的影響。禁令還可能阻止美國人訪問一個有利於創造性表達、經濟增長和溝通的流行平台。此外，禁令可能會阻礙美國企業進入關鍵的全球市場（估計約有8億的龐大用户羣）的能力。此外，這可能會限制在社交媒體上有影響的人與全球觀眾分享內容的能力，因為TikTok是實現這一目的的重要平台。

weizhen zhou

As a Chinese and media professional, I didn’t even download TikTok on my phone. But these congress man and woman sound like they are unaware of what they are talking about �� it doesn’t make any sense. Could have gone a better direction if they have any sort of legitimacy built into their brain.

作為一名中國人和媒體專業人士，我甚至沒有在手機上下載TikTok。但這些國會議員聽起來好像並不知道自己在説什麼，這沒有任何意義。如果他們的大腦中內置了任何合法性，他們本可以朝着更好的方向發展。

HeyMJ

Tiktok is partnering w/Oracle to manage, secure, protect, maintain and store user data. Oracle is a solid US Corp w/global Gov & Biz contracts. The committee tribunal was a poor performance by congressional members; making grandiose statements w/no actual fact-finding Q&A or substance.

Tiktok正在與甲骨文合作來管理、保護、維護和存儲用户的數據。甲骨文是一家可靠的、擁有來自全球政府和商業合同的美國公司。委員會中的國會議員的表現不佳，他們發表了浮誇但缺乏實際的事實調查問答或實質內容的聲明。

joyce chia

It’s obvious bullying and rude of some of the congressmen. Always running out of time and just give a one sided questioning. What’s the point having this 5 hour session.

Using TikTok, it’s the people’s choice. To be honest, I have never seen any distressing videos in Tiktok until I know of after I’ve watch this. I’m a user of other social media platforms for more than 10 years and in fact I’ve seen distressing videos out there instead. Mental health responsibility comes in many forms and thru other channels I.e. government and family. Keep a lookout on your love ones. Stop pointing fingers.

一些國會議員顯然是在欺凌而且十分粗魯，他們總是提出一個片面的問題然後不給對方時間回答。如此，這5個小時的聽證會有什麼意義？

使用TikTok是人們的選擇。老實説，我從來沒有在TikTok上看到過任何令人痛心的視頻，直到我看完這場聽證會之後我才知道（TikTok上存在令人痛心的視頻）。我使用其他社交媒體平台上10多年了，事實上，我在那裏看到過很多令人痛心的視頻。心理健康的責任有多種來源，如政府和家庭。留意你愛的人，別再指手畫腳了。

ney vioney

Interesting, seems like the congress deeply concerns children’s moral values and desperately trying keep them way from all contents relate to so-called Uyghur genocide , violence ect. But wait, whose media and drama series relentlessly promoting marijuana and substance abuse every second, I believe those content will deeply contaminate kid’s mental health as well ? When it comes to severe human right issues such as gun violence ，police brutality, promiscuity, child marriage, abortion, those congress folks and lawmakers turn blind eyes. But when anything remotely associates with China or Russia, congress will bolt from their chairs and function like the world class moral exemplars, sparing no effort to criticize these two countries. The sudden shift in tone has left me pondering the authenticity and their real purpose of their newfound outrage.

有趣的是，聽證會似乎非常關注兒童的道德價值觀並竭力讓他們遠離與所謂的W族種|族|滅|絕、暴力等有關的所有內容。但等等，是誰的媒體和電視劇每秒鐘都在無情地宣傳大麻和藥物濫用？我相信這些內容也會嚴重污染孩子的心理健康。當涉及到槍支暴力、警察暴行、濫交、童婚、墮胎等嚴重的人權問題時，那些國會議員和立法者視而不見。但是，當任何與中國或俄羅斯有絲毫聯繫的事情發生時，國會議員就會從他們的椅子上跳下來，像世界級的道德典範一樣工作並不遺餘力地批評這兩個國家。語氣的突然轉變讓我思考他們新發現的憤怒的真實性和真正的目的。

原文較長有刪節，查看更多譯文可點擊：櫻落網