假期最後一天查了一下美國那個《反猶主義意識法案》_風聞

法案全稱是Antisemitism Awareness Act。

法案本身只有6頁，文字很簡單，看不出那麼多內容，主要的釘子埋在第三款和第四款的規定裏：

SEC. 3. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) Antisemitism is on the rise in the United 13 States and is impacting Jewish students in K–12 

14 schools, colleges, and universities. 

(2) The International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (referred to in this Act as the ‘‘IHRA’’)

Working Definition of Antisemitism is a vital tool which helps individuals understand and identify the

various manifestations of antisemitism.

……

SEC. 4. DEFINITIONS. 

For purposes of this Act, the term ‘‘definition of anti19 semitism’’—

(1) means the definition of antisemitism adopted on May 26, 2016, by the IHRA, of which the United States is a member, which definition has

been adopted by the Department of State; and

(2) includes the ‘‘[c]ontemporary examples of antisemitism’’ identified in the IHRA definition.

也就是説這個IHRA有關反猶主義的現行定義及其示例是該法案的立法基礎。

大家笑的也是這個定義下面列舉的十三個反猶主義的表現例子。

查IHRA Antisemitism Working Definition (report-it.org.uk)，具體如下：

Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to: 

▪ Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion. 

▪ Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions. 

▪ Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews. 

▪ Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). 

▪ Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust. 

▪ Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.

▪ Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor. 

▪ Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation. 

▪ Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.

▪ Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.

▪ Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

X上有翻譯，轉過來：

1）以激進意識形態或極端宗教觀的名義呼籲、協助或為殺害或傷害猶太人辯護。 

2）對猶太人本身或猶太人作為集體的權力做出虛假、非人性、妖魔化或陳規定型的指控，例如，特別但不限於關於世界猶太人陰謀或猶太人控制媒體、經濟、政府或其他社會的神話機構。 

3）指責猶太人作為一個民族對單個猶太人或羣體所犯下的真實或想象的不當行為負責，甚至對非猶太人所犯下的行為負責。 

4）否認二戰期間國家社會主義德國及其支持者和同謀對猶太人進行種族滅絕的事實、範圍、機制（例如毒氣室）或故意性（大屠殺） 

5）指責猶太人作為一個民族，或以色列作為一個國家，發明或誇大了大屠殺。 

6）指責猶太公民更忠於以色列，或者更忠於全世界猶太人所謂的優先事項，而不是他們自己國家的利益。 

7）否認猶太人民的自決權，例如聲稱以色列國的存在是種族主義行為。 

8）採用雙重標準，要求其採取任何其他民主國家都沒有期望或要求的行為。 

9）使用與經典反猶太主義相關的符號和圖像（例如，猶太人殺害耶穌的説法或血腥誹謗）來描述以色列或以色列人。 

10）將當代以色列的政策與納粹的政策進行比較。 

11）讓猶太人對以色列國的行為集體負責。

結論：單就法案本身而言內容很平常，法案也沒有一個字一個字地轉錄這個定義及其舉例。但這個事兒不能細究，細究下去就很荒誕。。。IHRA原來自己説這個定義是non-binding的。現在好了，美國人給它法律化了。往好了説這是猶太人寄生盎薩取得的重大進展，往壞了説這是盎薩把猶太人架到火上烤的重要一步。

希望以色列人好自為之吧，希望猶太人好自為之吧。

留個記號。